Why the Irish Government needs an IT Strategy
Like so many others, inefficiencies in government and a lack of transparency have long been a source of minor annoyance to me. More recently this “minor annoyance” has become a significant source of frustration as I now feel that the lack of transparency and prompt action by the Irish Government is hitting me in the pocket in the form of extra taxes and levies every which way I turn. People and businesses everywhere have had to adjust sharply to the current economic reality and my question is, why hasn’t the Irish Government done this also?
There is limited value in me commenting broadly on Public Sector Reform, however I believe I can comment with some knowledge on the situation with government IT. Recently I have been in discussion with a couple of organisations who have expressed interest in collaborating on an Open Government initiative that I am trying to get underway, (more on that over the coming weeks…) a substantial part of this initiative involves taking public information and transforming it so as the data provides transparency and insight into the business of government for the general public.
While researching (digging through Government, Local Authority and State Body websites, publications, annual reports, etc) it became very clear to me that we have very little joined-up thinking when it comes to government technology. My initial purpose was to find most of the major data-sources available to the public, but I came up entirely empty handed. The sad truth is that there is virtually no useful government data made available to the public in any meaningful format.
While I was trying to figure out why we had a complete lack of useful information available from our public sector two very interesting government reports were published;
- Technology Actions to Support the Smart Economy
- Report of the Special Group on Public Service Numbers and Expenditure Programmes
Having read these two reports it struck me that many of the issues faced by Government IT are likely to be as a result of fragmented strategy and a lack of co-ordination between institutions. I began to feel that there was a glimmer of hope resulting from these two reports until I read back over a number of previous reports published by the Irish Government. In particular a report titled “Progress Implementing the Information Society” dated July 1999. This 1999 report is well worth dusting off on its 10th birthday and interestingly progress has been so poor, that this report could easily be re-dated and very few people would notice that it was in fact 10 years old.
I decided to dig a little deeper and signed up to www.etenders.gov.ie to get more insight into the procurement practices of government technology products and services and what I discovered was to say the least disappointing. From E-Tenders there were three points that struck me;
- The extraordinary level of obstacles that were put in the way of anyone who was interested in tendering for projects
- The duplication of services each individual government entity was procuring
- The seemingly complete lack of strategy and standards
In many cases the the “Conditions for Participation” section was in fact much longer than the “Description of the goods or services required” and many of these conditions ruled out any company that wasn’t many years old, this point alone in my view stops us getting value for money as it doesn’t allow many young and agile companies from participating in government contracts.
One R.F.T. (request for tender) in particular caught my attention (Tourism Ireland Imagery Website ). As far as I can make out, Tourism Ireland are looking to add a feature to their website to store and display photos. Sounds simple enough and a good idea (why wasn’t this part of the original design?), they go on to specify that “the contract would be expected to cost between €50K and €206K”. Two points I thought here;
- Why shoot yourself in the foot by telling everyone how much you are willing to spend
- Why not use a service like Flickr? Flickr is good enough for the official White House photo stream and at time of writing, hosts more than 3.7 billion images. It also has an API (Application Programming Interface) that would enable Tourism Ireland (Discover Ireland) to do pretty much anything they want to do with all their photos. On top of this there is a thriving community on Flickr that could be used to raise awareness of Ireland as a destination of choice for tourists. The cost? $24.95 per year, while I am not a mathematician, this sounds like a saving of somewhere between €50K and €206K.
Moving forward;
“The Taoiseach announced on 7th May 2008 that responsibility for eGovernment was to be consolidated in the Department of Finance. Responsibility for the delivery of individual eGovernment projects will remain the responsibility of individual Departments and Offices. This new arrangement will ensure that there is strong, coordinated leadership from the Centre, with regular communication between the Department of Finance and the various Departments, Offices and Agencies with responsibility for various projects.”
What exactly does this mean? Personally I think this is flawed thinking and a major throwback to the daft practices of the 1980’s and 90’s where corporates put Finance in charge of technology, added to this the Department of Finance is hardly a shining light of progression and transparency, just take a look at their website, not the most friendly site in the world and much of the content eg. the FAQ section hasn’t been updated since 2003.
In the “Report of the Special Group on Public Service Numbers and Expenditure Programmes” Colm McCarthy suggests the introduction of an IT Advisory Group comprising senior independent ICT practitioners from medium-large companies in Ireland to advise their counterparts in the civil service, meanwhile in the “Technology Actions to Support the Smart Economy” report Barry McSweeney subtly suggests the appointment of a government C.T.O.
My view is that a combination of the two suggestions from McCarthy & McSweeney could be just what we need. In a sense what we need is a Department of Technology or a Government IT Department. The C.T.O. in charge of this department should be accountable to a committee comprised of senior industry peers, a minister and a senior civil servant and the position should be open for re-appointment every three years (not a civil service job for life, this rotation could be used to ensure the best and brightest was always in charge). The new Irish Government IT Department should take under its control all the IT departments and teams from all government departments, local government and state bodies.
Here are just a few areas that should be concentrated on:
Government Websites;
The new Government IT Department should hire a crack team of web developers & project managers and take all of the development of Government Department, Local Authority and Government Body websites in-house. All of this development should be done on Open Source platforms, such as Ruby on Rials or Drupal. These platforms would facilitate rapid development and deployment of world class websites and should also include mandatory features to share information including the provision of RSS and API’s to enable public access to government information. Government Departments and Government Bodies (such as the Central Statistics Office) should be compelled to openly share all available information (except obviously personal and sensitive information) in an accessible and standard format.
This development would save us, the tax payers millions every year while providing increased transparency and access to information. Additionally I know many developers and entrepreneurs who could use this information in various projects and mash-ups (some existing and some yet to be created).
Government Network;
Many people don’t realise it but the Irish Government owns a very significant fibre optic network in Ireland. Despite this it seems that each government department, independently tenders out its connectivity requirements to external providers. If the government were to leverage this network and utilise it for all its own connectivity requirements they could significantly improve performance and save a very significant amount of money. Again, doing this would require a centralised approach.
Cloud Computing Adoption;
While there has been much mention of Cloud Computing in government circles, there has been (to my knowledge) no actual significant take-up of Cloud Computing Services. Each Government Department, Local Authority and Government Body has its own email and file storage servers. I would suggest that as a matter of urgency we should have a policy decision to immediately migrate all of these services to Google Apps. With a public sector comprising of some 370,000 people there is a potential saving of hundreds of millions of Euros to be made here on an annual basis. It is difficult to tell just how many people are employed in Government IT (according to Colm McCarthy’s report it is 1,300 people, but I believe that this number is vastly understated), but a vast proportion of them I believe are tied up in keeping email and file servers going. In addition, cloud computing is also a greener method of providing these services.
In many ways, what I have mentioned here may only be touching the surface. However, I believe if our government is serious about re-invigorating our economy on the basis of Ireland becoming a global digital hub, it must first get its own house in order. The few things I have mentioned here should not be difficult to implement and while saving us hundreds of millions of euros could also show the world that we are serious about becoming a knowledge economy.
If you have any comments on this topic or if Open Government is of interest to you, please fill in the comment box below - I would love to hear from you.
Tweet This Post
Digg This Post
Reddit This Post
Stumble This Post

Pingback: Twitted by Open_Government
#1 by Paul OFlaherty on August 23, 2009 - 5:48 pm
Quote
Great post Finbarr and while I agree with 95% of what you’ve written you lost me completely when you suggested migrating the email & file storage etc. of all government and local authorities to Google Apps.
Despite the cost of running our “own services” in that respect, I have a problem with essentially handing the combined data of the country to a third party, commercial entity based outside of the Republic.
Ignoring for the moment that some services are possibly already outsourced in such a manner, Google is subject to the laws and regulations of other countries and as we’ve seen happen in the financial world in the the past, the U.S, government has no problem attempting to gain access to the information of other countries which is held by US companies or on servers based in the U.S. This would be a major privacy concern for everybody in Ireland and is simply unacceptable. (Before I get branded a Google hater let me just add that I use Google apps for most of my domains both personal and professional.)
A better approach would be to consolidate all of the existing services under one unified “roof” so to speak, bringing a unified UI, feel and services to all government agencies, websites etc..
While it would require time and effort to do so, it would still save the nation millions every year and once implemented would continue to provide even more savings as the system could be built upon and used to provide the kind of 3rd party access to information and API’s that you discussed in your post (A task which may not be so easy with large portions of the information living on Googles servers in the cloud).
Also, one final note against moving to Google Apps. We’ve recently seen a single DDOS attack effect Twitter, Facebook and Google at the same time. Google Apps is known to go down from time to time. A random attack targeting Google or a specific Google user could bring Google Apps down and the knock on effect would be to destroy the productivity of every Government agency and authority in the country.
At least with our own system such an eventuality would probably be less likely and if it did happen we would at least know that it was targeted at us.
Pingback: Why the Irish Government needs an IT Strategy « Finbarr McCarthy | Ireland today
#2 by Jorge on September 2, 2009 - 1:04 pm
Quote
Why don’t you talk with the spanish government ando all the public administrations on Spain? we need some new ideas for our politicians
#3 by Richard on September 29, 2009 - 12:36 pm
Quote
The history of public ICT in Ireland is sad and frustrating. They have either been under resourced and ignored for years or, once in the food chain, behaved as a process inhibitor rather that a facilitator. Much of this comes from their haphazard development from the LGCSB (local government computer services board) through to their inability to compete with private sector financial incentives (pay).
My own view is that they (the tools for delivering solutions, not the guy who formats the floppy disks) are the great un-tapped resource for making existing work practices more productive in the public sector. This would address many of the low productivity issues in the public sector and liberate people from a career of drudgery and poor morale.
Again, leadership is missing on this one (generally through a combination of ignorance on the part of decision makers and resentment on behalf of the legions of floppy disk formatters).
#4 by Rayzer on February 1, 2010 - 11:06 pm
Quote
Finbar ,
Good article and I completely agree with you from the development point of view. I think the LGCSB has a lot to answer for as they were supposed to be the ground breakers from a development and systems production point of view. From experience, I have found that this is not the case. Dare I say that the crack team of developers that you suggest would have to be private sector orientated!!!
I have a small bit of an issue with the cloud computing scenario. The whole Microsoft Azure and such, sounds great and I have been to the demo’s, but when you get down to it, it’s a subscription service. These services, while they provide savage hardware capabilities may suffer for pure connections issues (back to the offices). I think that most of the money that you would save on local hardware and resources would be spent opening up the “Government Network” and subscriptions. Also I’m sure the offices would need some resources locally just to keep the other employees from going out on strike.
Everybody seems to suggest that the Government need to get their finger out. I actually think they have all the cards but they are playing them completely wrong. The department of finance’s arm on this (CMOD) has basically failed to make any sort of impact when you look a centralised provisioning of software and other agreements. As far as I can remember, we give a lot of these companies’ tax breaks. Surely some agreements in relation to hardware/software/communications could be put in place as part of these tax breaks.
As far as I am concerned IT is not top of a lot of government agenda’s. Most government departments and even county council’s are a complete law onto themselves. Therefore, IT will never become top priority keeping it well hidden as a cost centre. I am inclined to agree with Paul’s suggestion of consolidation. I not sure how it would work as one centre would never be enough. Maybe 5-6 centres strategically around these digital hubs would be a better solution. One thing I’m sure is that I’d need a calculator…. Even better would be a licence for excel 2010………