Archive for June, 2009

A new way of working

In my last post I outlined the direction that the technology behind cloud computing is heading.  This time I would like to talk briefly about a few of the more down to earth changes that the emergence of cloud computing will have and the social impact that will result.

I believe that we are at the precipice of a whole new way of working.  Traditional thinking suggests that once we have completed our education we go out and get a job. For my parent’s generation the objective was to secure a job for life, me and my generation took a different take on that and a good deal of people my age change jobs on average every three to five years.  I think that a good deal of the next generation will not necessarily hold down regular jobs in the same way that we do today.

Before I dive right into justifying this argument consider a few changes that have happened in the past and think about how they might help us predict what is going to happen in the future.

As the standard (and cost) of living increased in Western Europe and North America the cost of manufacturing spiralled and many companies relocated labour intensive / low margin operations to Asian countries, principally China. These companies typically continued their design and research & development at their headquarters.

More recently there was a huge rush for companies to engage B.P.O.’s (Business Process Outsourcers) to offload some of the non-core processes that were typically carried out in-house.  Typically the B.P.O.’s were located in India and did the work at a fraction of the cost.  While there is still significant debate over the success of many B.P.O. initiatives, the reality is that there are nearly two million people employed in India today in the industry.  In fact the B.P.O. industry in India is so successful that skills shortages, 20% annual wage inflation and skyrocketing real estate & infrastructure costs are threatening the competitiveness of India as a destination of choice for outsourcing.  Considering that the companies that provide these services must also charge a margin on the services the cost justification for traditional B.P.O. is diminishing fast.

I can’t remember who coined the expression “we don’t go to work anymore - we just work”, but it wraps up nicely the way I see things moving. Remote working has been on the table for several years but it has been fraught with difficulties, not least of which has been connectivity and security. Consider the impact cloud computing has on this, because the platforms and software are now on the cloud and accessible over the internet it is possible for anyone with a broadband connection to access their systems with the same performance that they would have in the office.

The fact that we are currently in a global recession and unemployment has risen sharply doesn’t necessarily mean that companies don’t have plenty of tasks and projects they want to undertake - it is probably more down to restrictive budgets and commitment avoidance (not wanting to commit to employment contracts).  There are many people who have come out of traditional employment are now freelancing and doing task based assignments for companies all over the world.

Some of the facilitators behind this are companies like ODesk, Elance and Guru.  These companies provide a marketplace for companies who need to get projects done, and people with the skills to undertake the project work come to bid on the assignments.  The geographical limits of traditional employment are no longer a factor with this approach.

While these sites currently cater primarily for the IT market, I think it is only a matter of time before there is much broader adoption of this model in other sectors.

Starting a small business has typically had a number of barriers to entry. The biggest barrier has typically been the range of skills needed to take a good idea and turn it into a tangible product or service. Typically most people starting out in business can’t afford to hire all the skills / buy all the equipment needed to compete with established players.  Cloud computing, PaaS (platform as a service) and WaaS (workforce as a service) have changed this.  Say for example I wanted setup a business to publish a magazine - what would I need?

Editors, Journalists, Copywriters, Photographers, Printers, Marketers, IT Staff, Accountants, Premises, Printing Presses, Distribution & Warehousing, Servers etc, etc……

I would probably do a little a little mental arithmetic and give up.

However, with the introduction of all the services I can now get on the web, and the cloud, I can now setup my servers on Amazon AWS, buy my images from Getty Images, Hire my editors, journalists and copywriters on ODesk, get my IT support from Guru and get MagCloud to print and deliver my magazines.  The same type of scenario is also becoming a reality if I want to design and manufacture consumer goods, there are services coming on stream everyday where providers will design and manufacture nearly anything for you.

From an individuals standpoint there are immense opportunities to become part of many of these service offerings, or for the entrepreneur the availability of skills, talent and services, “on-tap” provides unprecedented opportunities.

I certainly think the future is looking very bright and exciting.

[Post to Twitter] Tweet This Post  [Post to Digg] Digg This Post  [Post to Reddit] Reddit This Post  [Post to StumbleUpon] Stumble This Post 

Tags: , , , , ,

The Future of Cloud Computing

I have seen a good deal of commentary lately on cloud computing where people (who should be “in the know”) have put forward opinions that cloud computing is hosting by another name.

To put the record straight, yes you can use cloud computing as an alternative means of traditional server or website hosting, but it is so much more than that.  Unlike traditional hosting arrangements cloud computing offers many different layers and opportunities right now, and many new layers and opportunities are either just unfolding or yet to be discovered.

We are all familiar with SaaS (Software as a Service).  Well Cloud Computing readily provides the ability to use the cloud as PaaS (Platform as a Service).  One of the massive benefits of Cloud Computing is the flexible infrastructural platform it provides and the ability to change computing resource from a capital intensive / skills intensive investment into a utility.  Just like your electricity or gas supply, plug in and pay for as much or little as you use.

There are a number of industry heavy-weights investing heavily right now in cloud computing, including Amazon, IBM, Google, HP, Dell, Microsoft & Others.  All of these providers currently have their efforts concentrated on providing standalone public clouds.  Meanwhile VM Ware, and Red Hat are currently offering customers the ability to build private cloud computing platforms.

My view is that cloud computing platforms will soon reach a tipping point where it will no longer be at the cutting edge but instead will be the de-facto mechanism used for providing computing resources.  However, in order for this to happen there is one significant hurdle overcome first, that is, the ability for all the public and private clouds to interconnect seamlessly.  Consider it the “Inter-Cloud”.  For a comparison consider the growth of the internet, firstly there were a bunch of private networks that were not connected to each other, then with the emergence of the internet private networks began to connect to the internet using gateways.  Before too long the emergence and broad adoption of standard protocols (TCP/IP) eliminated the requirement for gateways and everything became connected to everything.  Something similar is inevitable for cloud computing and it is probably going to happen sooner than you think.

One technology to watch here is Red Hats MRG.  MRG stands for Messaging Real-Time Grid and is really a wolf in sheep’s clothing.  With technologies like MRG, Cloud Computing Consultants can now offer clients incredible computing power from existing server and desktop inventory by enabling scheduling to local and remote grids, rented cloud capacity and cycle-stealing from desktop PCs.

This is the start of something big, next time I post I will outline some very specific ideas I have on how these changes not only affect the IT industry but are also going to have a dramatic affect on how the world works.

[Post to Twitter] Tweet This Post  [Post to Digg] Digg This Post  [Post to Reddit] Reddit This Post  [Post to StumbleUpon] Stumble This Post 

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Zombie Thinking In The Digital Age

Zombie thinking is mindlessly doing what has always been done while ignoring diminishing returns.  It might seem like an odd opener but it seems to be happening alot lately.  Consider General Motors, for many decades the ultimate blue-chip company ground into bankruptcy because of zombie thinking.  There are any number of explanations for GM’s fate, but the main reason seems to stem from the fact that they didn’t listen to their customers and continued to produce products that they didn’t want.

On a smaller scale many companies suffer from a similar fate with their online efforts.  The difficulty starts out with the assumption that online marketing is the same as traditional marketing.  This view was OK with Web 1.0, but with the phenomenal adoption of Web 2.0 all the rules have changed.

It’s difficult to define the differences between Web 1.0 and Web 2.0 in a single sentence - One simple explanation is Web 1.0 was a monologue and Web 2.0 is a dialogue.  Traditionally, brand owners created, distributed and controlled the message, it was very much a one-way feed.  Nowadays the situation is very different, consumers now have a real voice, both individually and collectively.

Yes you can try to get hip by creating a company blog, a facebook page and even a twitter account.  You can pull out your brand guidelines book and customise these pages with your company colours and fonts, but is anyone actually looking?

“People communicate with people on Social Media, not with companies”


So you decide to let some of your employees start communicating with your customers via blogs, twitter and facebook, you pull out your brand guidelines book, but you can’t find the section that deals with this, sounds familiar?

The truth is that the majority of companies have not yet gotten around to deciding how to deal with this opportunity, some have taken the step of blocking it because they don’t understand it (this happened many times before - remember companies blocking internet access and email because it was only a distraction).

The road to success with Web 2.0 is a challenging one.  If you accept the basic principle of putting your people out in front of your brand you will have many difficult questions to address.

In addition to the areas you will already have covered such as, tone of voice, phrases to own, tense etc, you will now also need to provide guidelines on grammar, personal exposure (what you can reveal about yourself), politics, religion, interests, passions, etc.  Additionally, you need to start a campaign to monitor mentions of your company on the wire and decide whether or not your policy is to respond to every post, how to deal with criticism and even what to do with positive mentions and compliments.

There is also the discomforting fact that what your employees write doesn’t get sanitised by your PR and Legal departments, this actually gets at the essence of what Web 2.0 is about, if every statement were to be sanitised through the corporate mill there may be no message left at the end of it and after all your customers are looking for human interaction not polished corporate spiel accompanied by a ten page legal disclaimer.

One company who has stepped up to this challenge particularly well is Microsoft, for many years Microsoft was the company that everyone loved to hate, over the past couple of years Microsoft has used the power of its own people to put a personal face to the company and re-vitalise the brand in the eyes of its customers.  They refer to each of their employees as “Brand Ambassadors” and give them the responsibility to represent the Microsoft brand to the world in a very personal way.  For one, I think they have achieved remarkable success.

Here are a couple of tips to guide your efforts;

  • Dont ignore Web 2.0, its not going away anytime soon
  • Do participate in conversations but don’t try to dominate
  • Do use Buzz Monitoring Tools
  • Do update your brand guidelines to set some ground-rules for your employees engaging with customers on-line
  • Dont be afraid of making the odd mistake, afterall we are all human
  • Do let people have a little fun with this

“It is not the strongest of the species that survives, nor the most intelligent that survives. It is the one that is the most adaptable to change.” Charles Darwin

[Post to Twitter] Tweet This Post  [Post to Digg] Digg This Post  [Post to Reddit] Reddit This Post  [Post to StumbleUpon] Stumble This Post 

Tags: , , , , , ,

Have You Looked at Google Trends Lately

Just browsing around and I thought I would share this. www.google.com/trends
Search Volume For the word "Recession"
Above is data from google trends on the term “recession” Two things strike me;

  • The trend seems to be going the right way for 3 months now.
  • Isnt Google Trends just brilliant.
  • [Post to Twitter] Tweet This Post  [Post to Digg] Digg This Post  [Post to Reddit] Reddit This Post  [Post to StumbleUpon] Stumble This Post 

    Weather Forecast For Cloud Computing Consultants

    There has been a great deal of talk about cloud computing over the past year or two. It seems ironic to me that the recession has slowed down the pace of adoption of this technology because, amongst many other benefits, cloud computing can and will save organisations millions in their IT budgets.

    The difficulty seems to stem from an understandable reluctance of many IT departments and companies to commit to making what seems like a non-essential investment while the recession looms large.

    There are conflicting reports from the Analysts about where cloud computing is going, Merrill Lynch estimates that within the next five years, the annual global market for cloud computing will surge to $95 billion. Meanwhile in a Goldman Sachs survey less than 2 percent of the respondents (CIO’s) said cloud computing was a priority. For what its worth, my opinion is that cloud computing will be mainstream within the next two to three years and many companies will forego capital expenditure in favour of the utility server model.

    Charles King, an analyst with Pund-IT, said technologies like cloud computing deployments may slow down. “The message here is CIOs are looking primarily to tested, well-understood technologies that can result in savings or increased business efficiencies whose support can be argued from a financial point of view,”.

    It does seem that CIOs and business executives don’t understand the value and cost benefits of cloud computing. Perhaps then IT consultants need to take a step backwards and focus on what will grab the attention of IT leaders - “Cost Cutting” (yes its a dirty word but hey!!!). After all, the recession hasnt dampned the need for more computing power, storage and connectivity.

    My advice is, if you are an IT consultant, go out and educate your clients on the many benefits of cloud computing and help them to understand that it is a win-win proposition. If you suceed, not only will you be helping your clients save money, cut carbon emmisions and get incredible flexibility, you will also probably fill your diary for years to come.

    Cloud Computing(WikiPedia)

    [Post to Twitter] Tweet This Post  [Post to Digg] Digg This Post  [Post to Reddit] Reddit This Post  [Post to StumbleUpon] Stumble This Post 

    Tags: , ,